High-Tech Olympics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words - 1

High-Tech Olympics - Essay Example One of the most interesting technologies presented in London Paralympics was running blades. From the enormous amount of money and time spent by researchers, the prosthetics have an ultimate purpose to improve the sports performance of people taking part in sports events. The other technology is the cheetah running blade which is the most desirable for sportsmen because of its high performance and extreme durability. The blades work like normal legs and can absorb high weight shock when running. Among other technologies used in the Olympics games, 2012 are the Olympic Torch, the design of the torch changes for each of the Olympics games. It includes two burners, an outer bright flame, and small inner blue flame; Quantum Aquatic Timers, which was created by OMEGA Company. This device has an improved resolution of 1 Â µs to the previous devices, so the resolution is about 100 times greater; Starting Blocks, which are used for starts in swimming; and TouchPads stopped by each swimmer through applying a pressure of about 1,5kg to 2,5kg. During the Olympic Games 2012, the cameras that were used include 3D HD, Driving Cameras, Sky Cameras, and Motion Cameras. As explained in the paper, the common method used to rank success of countries at the Olympic Games is a ranking order based first on the number of gold medals won, then silver and bronze. The planning and preparations for 2012 Olympic and Paralympics Games in London started four years before the opening ceremony. Identifyi ng the long-term impacts on people, communities, the economy and the environment are usually part of the planning. London became the first city which accepted games already the third time. The games were passed in London, the capital of Great Britain, from July 27 to August 12.

Nursing Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 2

Nursing - Essay Example In the process, the researcher will examine the impact of portfolio assessment as a strategy used in promoting the students’ learning. The selection and use of assessment tools can significantly affect the quality of students’ learning. (Biggs, 1999) In order to achieve the best learning evaluation results, teachers should use the selected assessment tools in measuring only the previous learned context. Several studies show that different approach to learning is achieved with the use of different assessment tools format. (Scouller, 1998; Tang, 1994) For this reason, the utlitization of assessment portfolios is considered as a very powerful learning tool considering the fact that it can be used in enabling as well as motivating the students to experience a deeper approach to learning. (Scouller, 1998: 136) constructivist theory of knowledge is defined as â€Å"the act of purposely collecting and selecting the students’ work as a strategic way of documenting the students’ learning process and achievements.† The essence behind the use of portfolio assessment is not achieved from a direct teacher-to-student teaching process but is created by the students themselves as they go through their own learning activities. (Biggs & Tang, 1998) Basically, there are three main processes when using the portfolio assessment technique: (1) there is a need to carefully choose the criteria to be used in assessing the learning of the students; (2) the selection of evidence that is relevant in judging the criteria; and (3) judgment used in determining the extent wherein the criteria is met. (Biggs, 1999: 157) Although teachers could set the assessment criteria such as the course objectives and other necessary guidelines, each student will have an idea with regards to the required evidence of learning that will be used in portfolio assessment. For instance, the topic for the day is about the management of chronic pain associated with cancer. Therefore, the